Where we work/05

Period House Renovation on Ladbroke Grove

The spine of one of the earliest conservation areas in the country, running through an estate of sixteen communal gardens where the backs of the houses were designed as fronts.

Conservation areas here

Ladbroke

The Estate

The Ladbroke Conservation Area was designated in 1969, among the first in the country. Thomas Allason's 1820s plan set a spine road bisecting a grand circus of villas with communal gardens behind them, and building ran for over fifty years, most intensively between 1840 and 1868.

The southern houses along Holland Park Avenue are the earliest and read as Regency. The centre of the estate is 1850s and the northern terraces run to the mid 1870s. Houses run from three storeys over basement, the most common, to five in the largest houses on Ladbroke Gardens, Stanley Crescent, the south side of Elgin Crescent and west of Ladbroke Grove.

It very nearly failed. It took close to fifty years to sell all the houses, successive halts ruined the main developers, and Ladbroke Gardens was known locally as Coffin Row.

The Colour Rule, and the One Most Owners Get Wrong

Stucco was never meant to be painted. It was coloured in the mix to imitate Bath stone at a fraction of the cost, and the appraisal notes that possibly the only survivals of that intent are 14 Ladbroke Road, unpainted, and 68 Elgin Crescent, painted a Bath stone colour.

What the borough now expects is uniformity across the whole terrace rather than any particular shade: the best presented fully stuccoed terraces, pairs and triplets are those painted entirely white or off-white stone colour.

The detail that surprises almost everyone concerns cornices, architraves and window surrounds. Picking these out in a contrasting white is discouraged. The appraisal states that such detailing was intended to be finished in the same stone colour as the rest of the stucco and not picked out in another colour. Anyone specifying a two-tone scheme here is specifying something the borough regards as a later invention rather than a restoration. In Norland, immediately to the west, the opposite is required.

The Rear Is Not the Back

On a house backing one of the sixteen communal gardens, work to the rear is not permitted development, and this is the most expensive thing to discover late.

Because the gardens were reached directly from the houses rather than across a road, the rear elevations are formal. The houses on Stanley Gardens have fully stuccoed rears of similar design to their fronts, with pilasters, capitals, cornices and curved bays. The Dutch-gabled houses on Lansdowne Road carry the same gables, arched windows and decorative finishes at the back as at the front. The appraisal says plainly that these rears were designed to be appreciated in the same way as the front elevations.

Two further constraints follow. Light pollution from oversized glazing and basement rooflights is named as an issue in what the appraisal calls these valuable dark spaces. And the boundaries between private and communal garden carry their own uniform pattern of railings or bottle balustrades, garden by garden, with reinstatement encouraged where they have been lost.

The area, in brief

Designated
1969
Communal gardens
16, Grade II registered
Stucco
Uniform white or off-white
Rear elevations
Need permission

From RBKC's Ladbroke Conservation Area Appraisal, adopted 15 October 2015. Article 4 cover varies address by address and the direction applying to a particular house should be checked before work is priced.

Questions

What Owners Here Ask

Do we need permission to work on the back of the house?
On a house backing one of the communal gardens, almost certainly yes. Article 4 cover here extends to rear elevations and to boundaries facing the garden, because those rears were designed as formal elevations to be seen from it. Rear extensions, replacement rear windows and new garden boundaries all need permission.
Should we pick out the cornice in white?
The appraisal discourages it here. The mouldings were intended to read as the same stone colour as the rest of the stucco, and picking them out in a contrasting white is described as not an original feature. It is the opposite of the rule in Norland, a few streets west.
Can we add a roof extension?
The unbroken roofline is the governing principle, so it depends heavily on what the rest of your terrace has done. A roof addition that stands alone in an intact run, or that differs in design from its neighbours, is treated as harmful. On the mews, oversized mansards are singled out as overwhelming buildings that are low to start with.

Enquiries

Tell Us About the House.

Every introduction begins with a conversation about the house and what you have in mind. There is no charge for it and no obligation, and you appoint whom you choose.